18 Apr 14 at 3 pm


SZA. Freckle Gang.

haha, i’ve got the morgan freeman moles that people think are freckles

(via decolonizeyourmind)


SZA. Freckle Gang.

haha, i’ve got the morgan freeman moles that people think are freckles

& it’s cool, you can cry in your lover’s house and fuck with a violin and you will give your workshop & maybe drink too much later but you are alive. and that is what matters.

18 Apr 14 at 2 pm

it’s so cool when you have a workshop to give and then all your adolescent trauma resurfaces and you realize you have no memory of slamming your head so hard on the sandstone tiles of your father’s study after seeing your grandmother’s hand go limp after dying that you got a concussion and you remember your mother’s keening and the paramedics taking the body away but not the concussion or the fits that followed in the days later. you are nearly, several months from 31 but 17 still holds you and holds you.

18 Apr 14 at 11 am


From The Prison Slave as Hegemony’s (Silent) Scandal by Frank B. Wilderson III in Warfare in the American Homeland: Policing and Prison in a Penal Democracy edited by Joy James

(via gadaboutgreen)


From The Prison Slave as Hegemony’s (Silent) Scandal by Frank B. Wilderson III in Warfare in the American Homeland: Policing and Prison in a Penal Democracy edited by Joy James
18 Apr 14 at 10 am

Frank B. Wilderson, “Gramsci’s Black Marx: Whither the Slave in Civil Society?” [bolding mine] (via lugardepiedras)

(via gadaboutgreen)

"Thus, the black subject position in America is an antagonism, a demand that can not be satisfied through a transfer of ownership/organisation of existing rubrics; whereas the Gramscian subject, the worker, represents a demand that can indeed be satisfied by way of a successful War of Position, which brings about the end of exploitation. The worker calls into question the legitimacy of productive practices, the slave calls into question the legitimacy of productivity itself. From the positionality of the worker the question, ‘What does it mean to be free?’ is raised. But the question hides the process by which the discourse assumes a hidden grammar which has already posed and answered the question, ‘What does it mean to suffer?’ And that grammar is organised around the categories of exploitation (unfair labour relations or wage slavery). Thus, exploitation (wage slavery) is the only category of oppression which concerns Gramsci: society, Western society, thrives on the exploitation of the Gramscian subject. Full stop. Again, this is inadequate, because it would call white supremacy ‘racism’ and articulate it as a derivative phenomenon of the capitalist matrix, rather than incorporating white supremacy as a matrix constituent to the base, if not the base itself."

18 Apr 14 at 10 am

Neil deGrasse Tyson (via internalperception)

(via gadaboutgreen)

"I wanted to become something outside the paradigm of expectation of the people in power."

18 Apr 14 at 9 am

Audre Lorde, “The Uses of Anger” (via so-treu)

(via so-treu)

"For it is not the anger of Black women which is dripping down over this globe like a diseased liquid. It is not my anger that launches rockets, spends over sixty thousand dollars a second on missiles and other agents of war and death, pushes opera singers off rooftops, slaughters children in cities, stockpiles nerve gas and chemical bombs, sodomizes our daughters and our earth. It is not the anger of Black women which corrodes into blind, dehumanizing power, bent upon the annihilation of us all unless we meet it with what we have, our power to examine and to redefine the terms upon which we will live and work; our power to envision and to reconstruct, anger by painful anger, stone upon heavy stone, a future of pollinating difference and the earth to support our choices."

17 Apr 14 at 11 am

— Daily Haiku on Love by Tyler Knott Gregson

Wow. I have a hard time with being carried. But when I do ask to be carried, I REALLY need it. And I won’t apologize for needing it…

(via lovelyandnaughty)

It’s always okay to not be strong. The world will tell you that strength and self-reliance are of value, and that softness and the need to withdraw and be taken care of are not.

The world is wrong.

(via namelessin314)

working on this..

(via requiemforathought)

(Source: motivationforfitness, via talesofthestarshipregeneration)

"It’s ok you know,
to be carried now and then,
strength too needs a rest."

17 Apr 14 at 11 am

Why You Shouldn’t Tell That Random Girl On The Street That She’s Hot » Brute Reason (via brutereason)

this is literally so insanely fucking important fucking hell fuckity fuckkkkkk

(via pixiepienix)

(via talesofthestarshipregeneration)

"Here’s the thing. Men in our culture have been socialized to believe that their opinions on women’s appearance matter a lot. Not all men buy into this, of course, but many do. Some seem incapable of entertaining the notion that not everything women do with their appearance is for men to look at. This is why men’s response to women discussing stifling beauty norms is so often something like “But I actually like small boobs!” and “But I actually like my women on the heavier side, if you know what I mean!” They don’t realize that their individual opinion on women’s appearance doesn’t matter in this context, and that while it might be reassuring for some women to know that there are indeed men who find them fuckable, that’s not the point of the discussion.

Women, too, have been socialized to believe that the ultimate arbiters of their appearance are men, that anything they do with their appearance is or should be “for men.” That’s why women’s magazines trip over themselves to offer up advice on “what he wants to see you wearing” and “what men think of these current fashion trends” and “wow him with these new hairstyles.” While women can and do judge each other’s appearance harshly, many of us grew up being told by mothers, sisters, and female strangers that we’ll never “get a man” or “keep a man” unless we do X or lose some fat from Y, unless we moisturize//trim/shave/push up/hide/show/”flatter”/paint/dye/exfoliate/pierce/surgically alter this or that.

That’s also why when a woman wears revealing clothes, it’s okay, in our society, to assume that she’s “looking for attention” or that she’s a slut and wants to sleep with a bunch of guys. Because why else would a woman wear revealing clothes if not for the benefit of men and to communicate her sexual availability to them, right? It can’t possibly have anything to do with the fact that it’s hot out or it’s more comfortable or she likes how she looks in it or everything else is in the laundry or she wants to get a tan or maybe she likes women and wants attention from them, not from men?

The result of all this is that many men, even kind and well-meaning men, believe, however subconsciously, that women’s bodies are for them. They are for them to look at, for them to pass judgment on, for them to bless with a compliment if they deign to do so. They are not for women to enjoy, take pride in, love, accept, explore, show off, or hide as they please. They are for men and their pleasure."